-
Claus-Justus Heine authored
Convert back to alberta as package name (instead of alberta2). The version is already recorded in the version number of the shared libraries, and all libraries have names different from the ones in release 1.2 anyway. Move ALL inline viewing stuff to a separate library. I just got fed up by the library requirements of OpenDX. This also maskes it easier to separate the core ALBERTA stuff from the graphics business. Also, external viewers will most likely not need the inline viewers (e.g. Grape does not need or want gltools, meshtv does not need or want OpenDX and vice versa and so on). This also simplifies the "disable graphics" kill switch: the core libraries simply stay unchanged, it is just that the add-on libraries alberta_gfx_Xd.[so,la,a] are not compiled. Demo-package is in accordance with this scheme, and "make distcheck" succeeded. So it should be ok, in principle.
Claus-Justus Heine authoredConvert back to alberta as package name (instead of alberta2). The version is already recorded in the version number of the shared libraries, and all libraries have names different from the ones in release 1.2 anyway. Move ALL inline viewing stuff to a separate library. I just got fed up by the library requirements of OpenDX. This also maskes it easier to separate the core ALBERTA stuff from the graphics business. Also, external viewers will most likely not need the inline viewers (e.g. Grape does not need or want gltools, meshtv does not need or want OpenDX and vice versa and so on). This also simplifies the "disable graphics" kill switch: the core libraries simply stay unchanged, it is just that the add-on libraries alberta_gfx_Xd.[so,la,a] are not compiled. Demo-package is in accordance with this scheme, and "make distcheck" succeeded. So it should be ok, in principle.